Guido van Rossum writes: > Also, I don't want to ignore the alternative interface that was > suggested by /F. It uses feed() similar to htmllib c.s. This has > some advantages (although we might want to define some compatibility > so it can also feed directly into a file). I think one or the other can be used, and then a wrapper that converts to the other interface. Perhaps the encoders should provide feed(), and a file-like wrapper can convert write() to feed(). It could also be done the other way; I'm not sure if it matters which is "normal." (Or perhaps feed() was badly named and should be write()? The general intent was a little different, I think, but an output file is very much a stream consumer.) -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake@acm.org> Corporation for National Research Initiatives
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4