On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > <IMO> > Since this is the first time a Python Consortium member is > pushing development, I think we can learn a lot here. For one, > it should be clear that money doesn't buy everything, OTOH, > we cannot put the whole thing at risk just because > of some minor disagreement that cannot be solved between the > parties. The standard solution for the latter should be a > customized Python interpreter. > </IMO> hehe... funny you mention this. Go read the Consortium docs. Last time that I read them, there are no "parties" to reach consensus. *Every* technical decision regarding the Python language falls to the Technical Director (Guido, of course). I looked. I found nothing that can override the T.D.'s decisions and no way to force a particular decision. Guido is still the Benevolent Dictator :-) Cheers, -g p.s. yes, there is always the caveat that "sure, Guido has final say" but "Al can fire him at will for being too stubborn" :-) ... but hey, Guido's title does have the word Benevolent in it, so things are cool... -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4