A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-November/001179.html below:

[Python-Dev] Internationalization Toolkit

[Python-Dev] Internationalization Toolkit [Python-Dev] Internationalization ToolkitBarry A. Warsaw bwarsaw@cnri.reston.va.us (Barry A. Warsaw)
Thu, 11 Nov 1999 11:04:29 -0500 (EST)
>>>>> "M" == M  <mal@lemburg.com> writes:

    M> Doesn't Python convert class exceptions to strings when -X is
    M> used ? I would guess that many scripts already rely on the
    M> class based mechanism (much of my stuff does for sure), so by
    M> the time 1.6 is out, I think -X should be considered an option
    M> to run pre 1.5 code rather than using it for performance
    M> reasons.

This is a little off-topic so I'll be brief.  When using -X Python
never even creates the class exceptions, so it isn't really a
conversion.  It just uses string exceptions and tries to craft tuples
for what would be the superclasses in the class-based exception
hierarchy.  Yes, class-based exceptions are a bit of a performance hit
when you are catching exceptions in Python (because they need to be
instantiated), but they're just so darn *useful*.  I wouldn't mind
seeing the -X option go away for 1.6.

-Barry



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4