On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Greg Stein wrote: > Ha! I was getting ready to say exactly the same thing. Are building Python > for a particular customer, or are we building it to Do The Right Thing? > > I've been getting increasingly annoyed at "well, HP says this" or "HP > wants that." I'm ecstatic that they are a Consortium member and are > helping to fund the development of Python. However, if that means we are > selling Python's soul to corporate wishes rather than programming and > design ideals... well, it reduces my enthusiasm :-) What about just explaining the rationale for the default-less point of view to whoever is in charge of this at HP and see why they came up with their rationale in the first place? They might have a good reason, or they might be willing to change said requirement. --david
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4