Tim Peters wrote:
...
> > Continuations involving only Python stack frames might be supported,
> > if we can agree on the the sharing / copying semantics. This is where
> > I don't know enough see questions at #2 above).
>
> I'd like to go back to examples of what they'd be used for <wink> -- but
> fully fleshed out. In the absence of Scheme's ubiquitous lexical closures
> and "lambdaness" and syntax-extension facilities, I'm unsure they're going
> to work out reasonably in Python practice; it's not enough that they can be
> very useful in Scheme, and Sam is highly motivated to go to extremes here.
>
> give-me-a-womb-and-i-still-won't-give-birth-ly y'rs - tim
I've put quite many hours into a non-recursive ceval.c
already. Should I continue? At least this would be a little
improvement, also if the continuation thing will not be born. ?
- chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at appliedbiometrics.com>
Applied Biometrics GmbH : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 101 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net
10553 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net
PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
we're tired of banana software - shipped green, ripens at home
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4