The illustrious Sam Rushing avers: >Continuations are more powerful than coroutines, though I admit >they're a bit esoteric. I programmed in Scheme for years without >seeing the need for them. But when you need 'em, you *really* need >'em. No way around it. Frankly, I think I thought I understood this once but now I know I don't. How're continuations more powerful than coroutines? And why can't they be implemented using threads (and semaphores etc)? ...I'm not promising I'll understand the answer... -- Aaron Watters === I taught I taw a putty-cat!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4