A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-May/095217.html below:

[Python-Dev] coroutines vs. continuations vs. threads

[Python-Dev] coroutines vs. continuations vs. threads [Python-Dev] coroutines vs. continuations vs. threadsAaron Watters arw at ifu.net
Mon May 17 20:06:18 CEST 1999
The illustrious Sam Rushing avers:
>Continuations are more powerful than coroutines, though I admit
>they're a bit esoteric.  I programmed in Scheme for years without
>seeing the need for them.  But when you need 'em, you *really* need
>'em.  No way around it.

Frankly, I think I thought I understood this once but now I know I
don't.
How're continuations more powerful than coroutines?
And why can't they be implemented using threads (and semaphores etc)?

...I'm not promising I'll understand the answer...
    -- Aaron Watters

===
I taught I taw a putty-cat!




More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4