RetroSearch Browse

Thu May 6 07:43:16 CEST 1999 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-May/095191.html

[Tim notes that moving to a DFA regexp engine would rule out some future
 aping of Perl mistakes <wink>]

[Barry "The Great Compromiser" Warsaw]
> I know zip about the internals of the various regexp package.  But as
> far as the Python level interface, would it be feasible to support
> both as underlying regexp engines underneath re.py?  The idea would be
> that you'd add an extra flag (re.PERL / re.TCL ?  re.DFA / re.NFA ?
> re.POSIX / re.USEFUL ? :-) that would select the engine and compiler.
> Then all the rest of the magic happens behind the scenes, with
> appropriate exceptions thrown if there are syntax mismatches in the
> regexp that can't be worked around by preprocessors, etc.
>
> Or would that be more confusing than yet another different regexp
> module?

It depends some on what percentage of the Python distribution Guido wants to
devote to regexp code <0.6 wink>; the Tcl pkg would be the largest block of
code in Modules/, where regexp packages already consume more than anything
else.

It's a lot of delicate, difficult code.  Someone would need to step up and
champion each alternative package.  I haven't asked Andrew lately, but I'd
bet half a buck the thrill of supporting pcre has waned.

If there were competing packages, your suggested interface is fine.  I just
doubt the Python developers will support more than one (Andrew may still be
young, but he can't possibly still be naive enough to sign up for two of
these nightmares <wink>).

i'm-so-old-i-never-signed-up-for-one-ly y'rs  - tim

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-May/095191.html below:

[Python-Dev] Tcl 8.1's regexp code (was RE: [Python-Dev] Why Foo is better than Baz)