Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > From: Christian Tismer <tismer at appliedbiometrics.com>
>
> > I'd really like to look into that.
> > Also I wouldn't worry too much about speed, since this is
> > such a cool feature. It might even be a speedup in some cases
> > which otherwise would need more complex handling.
> >
> > May I have a look?
>
> Sure!
>
> (I've forwarded Christian the files per separate mail.)
>
> I'm also interested in your opinion on how well thought-out and robust
> the patches are -- I've never found the time to do a good close
> reading of them.
Coming back from the stackless task with is finished now,
I popped this task from my stack.
I had a look and it seems well-thought and robust so far.
To make a more trustable claim, I would need to build and test it.
Is this still of interest, or should I drop it?
The follow-ups in this thread indicated that the opinions
about flexible namespaces were quite mixed. So,
should I waste time in building and testing or better save it?
chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at appliedbiometrics.com>
Applied Biometrics GmbH : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 101 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net
10553 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net
PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
we're tired of banana software - shipped green, ripens at home
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4