>>>>> "SM" == Skip Montanaro <skip at mojam.com> writes: SM> Oh, one other thing I forgot. Split (join) and splitfields SM> (joinfields) used to be different. They've been the same for SM> a long time now, long enough that I no longer recall how they SM> used to differ. I think it was only in the number of arguments they'd accept (at least that's what's implied by the module docos). SM> In making the leap from string module to SM> string methods, I suggest dropping the long names altogether. I agree. Thinking about it, I'm also inclined to not include startswith and endswith in the string module. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4