RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jun 11 10:15:33 CEST 1999 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-June/095384.html

David Ascher wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps join() ought to be a built-in function?
> 
> Would it do the moral equivalent of a reduce(operator.add, ...) or of a
> string.join?
> 
> I think it should do the former (otherwise something about 'string' should
> be in the name), and as a consequence I think it shouldn't have the
> default whitespace spacer.

AFAIK, Guido himself proposed something like this on c.l.p a
few months ago. I think something like the following written
in C and optimized for lists of strings might be useful:

def join(sequence,sep=None):

    x = sequence[0]
    if sep:
	for y in sequence[1:]:
	    x = x + sep + y
    else:
	for y in sequence[1:]:
	    x = x + y
    return x

>>> join(('a','b'))
'ab'
>>> join(('a','b'),' ')
'a b'
>>> join((1,2,3),3)
12
>>> join(((1,2),(3,)))
(1, 2, 3)

Also, while we're at string functions/methods. Some of the stuff
in mxTextTools (see Python Pages link below) might be of general
use as well, e.g. splitat(), splitlines() and charsplit().

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
______________________________________________________________________
Y2000:                                                   203 days left
Business:                                      http://www.lemburg.com/
Python Pages:                           http://www.lemburg.com/python/

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-June/095384.html below:

[Python-Dev] String methods... finally