Tim Peters wrote:
>
> [Christian Tismer]
> > ...
> > If it's none of the three above, I'd be happy to get a hint if I
> > should continue, or if and what I should change.
>
> Sorry, Chris! Just a case of "no time" here. Of *course* you should
> continue, and Guido should pop in with an encouraging word too -- or a
> "forget it".
Yup, I know this time problem just too good.
Well, I think I got something in between. I was warned
before, so I didn't try to write final code, but I managed
to prove the concept.
I *will* continue, regardless what anybody says.
> or-were-you-running-ndiff-under-the-stackless-python<wink>?-ly y'rs - tim
I didn't use ndiff, but regular "diff", and it worked.
But since theere is not much change to the code, but
some significant change to the control flow, I found
the diff output too confusing. Windiff was always open
when I wrote that, to be sure that I didn't trample
on things which I didn't want to mess up. A good tool!
ciao - chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at appliedbiometrics.com>
Applied Biometrics GmbH : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 101 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net
10553 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net
PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
we're tired of banana software - shipped green, ripens at home
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4