>>>>> "CT" == Christian Tismer <tismer at appliedbiometrics.com> writes: CT> Christian Tismer wrote: [a lot] >> fearing the feedback :-) ciao - chris CT> I expected everything but forgot to fear "no feedback". :-) CT> About 5 or 6 people seem to have taken the .zip file. Now I'm CT> wondering why nobody complains. Was my code so wonderful, so CT> disgustingly bad, or is this just boring :-? CT> If it's none of the three above, I'd be happy to get a hint if I CT> should continue, or if and what I should change. I'm one of the silent 5 or 6. My reasons fall under "None of the above." They are three in number: 1. No time (the perennial excuse; next 2 weeks are quite hectic) 2. I tried to use ndiff to compare old and new ceval.c, but ran into some problems with that tool. (Tim, it looks like the line endings are identical -- all '\012'.) 3. Wasn't sure what to look at first My only suggestion would be to have an executive summary. If there was a short README file -- no more than 150 lines -- that described the essentials of the approach and told me what to look at first, I would be able to comment more quickly. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4