[Please dont copy this out of this list :-]
> world. A couple of days ago, I received an email from him (part of a
> conversation on the perl5porters list apparently) where he warned me
> that ActiveState was planning a similar takeover of Python. After
> some comments from tchrist ("he's a loon") I decided to ignore David.
I believe this to be true - at least "take over" in the same way they have
"taken over" Perl. I have it on very good authority that Active State's
medium term business plan includes expanding out of Perl alone, and Python
is very high on their list. I also believe they would like to recruit
people to help with this goal. They are of the opinion that Python alone
could not support such a business quite yet, so attaching it to existing
infrastructure could fly. On one hand I tend to agree, but on the other
hand I think that we do a pretty damn good job as it is, so maybe a Python
could fly all alone?
And Ive got to say that personally, such an offer would be highly
attractive. Depending on the terms (and I must admit I have not had a good
look at the ActiveState Perl licenses) this could provide a real boost to
the Python world. If the business model is open source software with
paid-for support, it seems a win-win situation to me. However, it is very
unclear to me, and the industry, that this model alone can work generally.
A business-plan that involves withholding sources or technologies until a
fee has been paid certainly moves quickly away from win-win to, to quote
Guido, "highly competitive proprietary business goals".
May be some interesting times ahead. For some time now I have meant to
pass this on to PPSI as a heads-up, just incase they intend playing in that
space in the future. So consider this it ;-)
Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4