[Guido] > ... > Hmm... I think that if the generator is started by a for loop, it's > okay for the loop to assume it is the master of the universe -- just > like there's no force in the world (apart from illegal C code :) that > can change the hidden loop counter in present-day for loop. If it comes to a crunch, me too. I think your idea of forcing an exception in the frame's destructor (to get the stacks cleaned up, and any suspended "finally" blocks executed) renders this a non-issue, though (it will "just work", and if people resort to illegal C code, it will *still* work <wink>). hadn't-noticed-you-can't-spell-"illegal-code"-without-"c"-ly y'rs - tim
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4