[Barry] > Guido> Anybody got a reason why -X should stay? > > Kill it. You already said that. Anybody else? > Guido> (The next step would be to outlaw raise with a string > Guido> argument; I think I can't make that for 1.6. But it would > Guido> be a good idea to scan the standard library for string > Guido> exceptions and convert all of them.) > > Or require that exception classes be derived from exceptions.Exception > :) That's hard to require. But it could easily be a requirement checked by one of the hypothetical typecheckers that are being discussed in the types-sig. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4