"M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > I guess it would be ok to waste space. You could provide > a .cleanup() or .rewrite() method that takes care of > reorganizing the file to fill up the gaps. OK, adding a duplicate name replaces the old file. > Well the module seems to work just fine with compression > on, so disallowing it or issuing a warning would reduce its value, > IMHO. Yes compression works, but 90% of Python installations don't have zlib, so it is an ERROR to create archives with compression when these archives are distributed to other sites. > How about making compression a boolean value and then > converting any true value to 8 ? It would close the door to future or other compression methods. Currently the method must be 0 or 8 or a traceback will result. JimA
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4