On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > If we were to combine them, then we would need to maintain the ordering > > requirements implied by sys.path. However, this would be problematic if > > sys.path changed -- we would have to detect the situation and rebuild a > > merged dict. > > No need to worry about this: just don't merge the caches. Compared to > the hundreds of failed open() calls that are done now, it's no big > deal to do 12 failed Python dictionary lookups instead of one. Have no fear... I wasn't planning on this... complicates too much stuff for too little gain. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4