[/F] > PS. on the performance side of things, did you know > that 're' can be up to ten times slower than 'regex'? > but people don't complain -- probably because it > allows them to do things they couldn't do before... Bad example: people do complain about this. Those who care a lot continue to use regex, temporarily pacified by the promise that re.py will get recoded in C and thus regain a good chunk of regex's speed. Those who care a whale of a lot continue to use Perl <0.9 wink>.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4