Guido van Rossum <guido@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> wrote: > > Actually I'm so happy with the magic cookie scheme that I've > > advocated at various times in the past that something similar also > > be used for determining where builtin modules and frozen modules > > appear in sys.path... > > I see the magic cookies as a poor man's (but more compatible!) version > of a chain of importers as advocated by Greg Stein and other imputil > fans. I like the idea, except that I think that the chain should be > manipulatable more easily than the current imputil implementation. I know this has been asked before, but cannot recall any of the arguments against it: how about replacing Jack's magic cookies with importer objects? (in other words, if a path item is a string, import as usual. otherwise, ask the importer for a code object or maybe better, a module object). </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4