Fredrik, Care to elaborate? Statements like "buffer interface needs a redesign" or "the buffer interface is not good enough to use on top of the virtual image memory interface" really only give me the impression you have a bee in your bonnet over these buffer interfaces. If you could actually stretch these statements out to provide even _some_ background, problem statement or potential solution it would help. All I know is "Fredrik doesnt like it for some unexplained reason". You found an issue with array reallocation - great - but thats a bug rather than a design flaw. Can you tell us why its not good enough, and an off-the-cuff design that would solve it? Or are you suggesting it is unsolvable? I really dont have a clue what your issue is. Jim (for example) has made his position and reasoning clear. You have only made your position clear, but your reasoning is still a mystery. Mark. > > unfortunately, the buffer interface is not good enough to use > on top of the virtual image memory interface...
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4