RetroSearch Browse

Fri Apr 30 09:49:42 CEST 1999 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-April/095151.html

Guido van Rossum wrote:
...
> Ian did benchmarks and found that the new code was consistently
> slower, by 3-6%.  Perhaps for Python 1.6 this will be acceptable (the
> "Python IS slow" thread notwithstanding :-); or perhaps someone can
> have a look at it and squeeze some more time out of it?  I'll gladly
> forward the patches.

I'd really like to look into that.
Also I wouldn't worry too much about speed, since this is 
such a cool feature. It might even be a speedup in some cases
which otherwise would need more complex handling.

May I have a look?

ciao - chris

-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer at appliedbiometrics.com>
Applied Biometrics GmbH      :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 101   :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net
10553 Berlin                 :     PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net
PGP Fingerprint       E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15  D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
     we're tired of banana software - shipped green, ripens at home

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-April/095151.html below:

[Python-Dev] More flexible namespaces.