> Ian did benchmarks and found that the new code was consistently > slower, by 3-6%. Perhaps for Python 1.6 this will be acceptable (the > "Python IS slow" thread notwithstanding :-); or perhaps someone can As long as we get someone working on a consistent 3-6% speedup in other areas this wont be a problem :-) I will attach it to my long list - but Im going to put all my efforts here into Unicode first, and probably the threading stuff second :-) Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4