On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Have we been talking about Python 2 or Python 1.6? If we're talking about > > Python 2, has anyone given a serious look at the LLNL gang's C++/Python > > stuff? If I recall Paul Dubois' talk at the last conference, it sounded > > like their work made it much easier to implement extension modules. > > I've mostly had 1.6 in mind. See recent traffic in the C++ SIG > archives for the status of Paul's CXX. Recent traffic? There's nothing in there that's substantive since... uh, well, I got tired of looking back. =) CXX is very cool, but it is still pushing the envelope of many C++ compilers. From what I gather, recent egcs' do manage with it, and since egcs is going to replace gcc, I expect that many platforms will be able to "do" CXX relatively soon. I vote to stay on the 1.6 track for now.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4