RetroSearch Browse

Wed Apr 28 18:06:03 CEST 1999 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-April/095145.html

> Have we been talking about Python 2 or Python 1.6?  If we're talking about
> Python 2, has anyone given a serious look at the LLNL gang's C++/Python
> stuff?  If I recall Paul Dubois' talk at the last conference, it sounded
> like their work made it much easier to implement extension modules.

I've mostly had 1.6 in mind.  See recent traffic in the C++ SIG
archives for the status of Paul's CXX.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-April/095145.html below:

[Python-Dev] LLNL C++ as base for Python 2?