RetroSearch Browse

Wed Apr 21 23:51:11 CEST 1999 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-April/095113.html

David Beazley wrote:
> 
> >
> > Misc
> >
> 
> Depending on how deep I want to dig, I may have some patches to
> ParseTuple() that would make life easier for some of us extension
> writing fans.  As it is right now, my experimental version of Swig
> is using it's own version of ParseTuple (for various reasons).
> Also, out of curiousity, is anyone making heavy use of the CObject
> type right now?

You mean the one in Objects/cobject.c ? Sure, all my type extensions
export their C API that way... and it works just great (no more
linker problems, nice error messages when extensions are not found,
etc.).

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg                               Y2000: 254 days left
---------------------------------------------------------------------
          : Python Pages >>> http://starship.skyport.net/~lemburg/  :
           ---------------------------------------------------------

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-April/095113.html below:

[Python-Dev] Notice of intent: rich comparisons