On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:14:57 -0800 fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > > The reason for this is that the 'direction' property is not really a > property of the document style, but of the document content. Authors > are strongly discouraged, as it says in the specification, from using > the 'direction' property and are encouraged to use the 'dir' attribute > in HTML. The raw text of the document will not display correctly in > UAs that don't support CSS, for example, if the 'dir' attribute is > not set correctly in the HTML. > > The block flow direction, which 'writing-mode' sets, however, is a > stylistic choice. The author will choose whether to set it based on > the desired layout of the page. It belongs in CSS. Don't get the point! You made settings illogic only because you did not want to place the red warning down to the property writing-mode? That's all that is neccessary. And, what did you gain? You now have a lonely property nobody shall use because of that red warning! What a strategy! Merge back both properties, put the warning for HTML-writers to that one property and let people set both 'dir' and 'writing mode' because this is not a burden and will be the common tip in all blogs out there! You think very strange here at W3C - very strange! Regards, --------------------------------------------------------------------- Dennis Heuer einz@verschwendbare-verweise.seinswende.de
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2018 01:38:10 UTC
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4