> On Mar 15, 2017, at 12:58 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > > Tab and I just pushed the changes to drop the 3-value syntax from <position> per > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0052.html > The canonical reference is now (again) in CSS Values and Units 3. > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#position > > This implies changes to object-position, mask-position, radial gradients, > and offset-position. It also makes <position> available for use in > transform-origin and perspective-origin. > > (Note, if implementers want us to also drop from background-position, I'm sure the > CSSWG could consider that as well if presented with compelling Web-compat data > indicating no problems... but we've otherwise special-cased background-position as > superset syntax that includes the 3-value clauses.) > > We would like to request > > A. Review of the altered syntax definition. > and subject to approval of A, > B. Republication of css-values-3. > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#changes > C. Republication of css-backgrounds-3. > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#changes-2014-09 > D. Republication of motion-1 (which is soooooo overdue for publication). > https://drafts.fxtf.org/motion/ vs https://www.w3.org/TR/motion-1/ > E. Pending Transform edits and state of general coherence, republication of Transforms. I have reviewed the new syntax and it looks reasonable as the basis for transform-origin, and in perspective-origin. Simon
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2017 20:23:17 UTC
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4