On 10/12/15 9:26 PM, John Waterson wrote: > Looking for some guidance from the flexbox spec authors as to whether > the textarea element should, at least in theory, be able to act as a > flex container. <textarea> is a replaced element, so from the point of view of CSS it's not a container of any kind. It's a leaf, whose rendering is not defined by CSS at all. At least in theory; in practice UAs apply a random set of CSS properties to the insides of <textarea> in random ways that are not defined in any spec. > I have already raised this question on flexbugs, and was advised to > ask on www-style for clarification, on the reasonable grounds that > textarea is a bit odd as a container, in that it usually only contains > text nodes. It doesn't, though. Or more precisely, the text that it renders and the text nodes that it contains in the DOM are not at all the same thing. -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2015 15:09:43 UTC
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4