A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Apr/subject.html below:

public-tracking@w3.org from April 2012: by subject

'do not cross-site track' response to Aleecia's outline ACTION-152 - Write up logged-in-means-out-of-band-consent Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal action-159 Draft shorter language to describe conditions for consent ACTION-172: Write up more detailed list of use cases for origin/origin exceptions Agenda for 2012-04-04 call Agenda for 24 April, 2012 call agenda: 18 April 2012 call Aleecia's Template for Issue-10, Issue-17, Issue 19 Alternative 6 An alternative to site-specific user granted exceptions (Issue-111) An update on ISSUE-111: How user-agent can signal DNT exceptions to the site (ACTION-188) Are blanked exceptions usable in the EU? [ISSUE-129] AW: Data mining as a means to protect privacy in social networks AW: Re: Behavior of user agents after granting exceptions Behavior of user agents after granting exceptions CDT's proposals re: template for parties and business uses Clarification for ACTION-170: What is the use case? CVS commit email list deeper look at agenda items EFF/Mozilla/Stanford Proposal explicit-explicit exception pairs F2F logistics f2f logistics and agenda, please indicate if you're attending first party resource Fwd: ACTION-120 Web Wide Exemptions and JavaScript Fwd: Impromptu Tech Policy Happy Hour - Weds 4/11 Geolocation compliance (ACTION-165) is a site-wide exception 'safe'? ISSUE-130: Web-wide exceptions - iare there objections to permitting those? ISSUE-131: What should implementations look like to satisfy our exit criteria for CR? ISSUE-132: Should the spec speak to intermediaries or hosting providers to modify any responses/statements about DNT compliance? ISSUE-133: What effect does legal liability or consistent data practices between affiliates have on the definition of breadth of a party? ISSUE-134: Would we additionally permit logs that are retained for a short enough period? ISSUE-135: Draft Global Considerations document ISSUE-137: Does hybrid tracking status need to distinguish between first party (1) and outsourcing service provider acting as a first party (s) ISSUE-139: Should we have Web-Wide Exception via a Well-Known URI? ISSUE-142: How should protocol data be allowed to be used in the first N weeks? ISSUE-152: Write up logged-in-means-out-of-band-consent ISSUE-49: Third party as first party - is a third party that collects data on behalf of the first party treated the same way as the first party? ISSUE-60: proposed to close Issues mentioned in the TPE document, or non-closed in the database and applying to TPE Media requests Minutes from DC, April 2012 navigator.doNotTrack next face-to-face meeting: June 20-22, Seattle Notes from the Exception Working Group [ISSUE-113, ISSUE-128, ISSUE-129, ISSUE-130] notes from TPE breakout section on negotiating site exceptions on users and user-agents and parties Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) Parties and Necessary Business Uses Permitted behavior of third parties under user-granted exceptions? Possible User Harms Through Multi-Site Data Collection (Group 2) post-call housekeeping & upcoming discussions Privacy Harms process clarifications reminder: doodle poll for f2f reporters and observers Scheduling for additional meeting -- prompt responses requested social: drinks & dinners table of 5 proposals TPE Call for text proposals: ISSUE-128: HTTP error status code to signal that tracking is required? TPE: Input for our discussions in DC Tracking Preference Expression Spec Suggestion Tracking Status Hybrid tracking-ISSUE-136 (depends): Resolve dependencies of the TPE on the compliance specification [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] tracking-ISSUE-138: Web-Wide Exception Well Known URI [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] tracking-ISSUE-140: Do we need site-specific exceptions? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] tracking-ISSUE-141: Do a review of the Tracking Protection WG deliverables according to http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] tracking-ISSUE-143 (Reciprocal Consent): Activating a Tracking Preference must require explicit, informed consent from a user [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] tree killer version: all 5 compliance proposals Updated response to Aleecia's Template, Issue-10, Issue-17, Issue-19, Issue-22, Issue-24, Issue-25, Issue-31, Issue-49, Issue-73 Use cases for consideration as "Ongoing Security Concerns" for 3rd parties W3C F2F logistics for Bellevue, WA W3C TPWG Process Follow UP Wish you a successful f2f meeting!

Last message date: Monday, 30 April 2012 23:47:41 UTC

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.3