Showing content from https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2011Sep/author.html below:
public-tracking@w3.org from September 2011: by author
Adrian Bateman
Aleecia M. McDonald
- Agenda for 2011-09-28 TPWG call (Monday, 26 September)
- Re: Facebook tracking (Sunday, 25 September)
- updated agenda for tomorrow (Wednesday, 21 September)
- Welcome to Matthias, co-chair (Wednesday, 21 September)
- Re: 1st Tracking Protection WG F2F - Cambridge, USA - 21-22 September 2011 (Friday, 16 September)
- Overflow call: 16 September at 8 am Pacific / 11 am Eastern / 17:00 Central European (Wednesday, 14 September)
- Conference call invitation: 14 September at 8 am Pacific / 11 am Eastern / 17:00 Central European (Tuesday, 13 September)
- Welcome to the mailing list (Tuesday, 13 September)
Bjoern Hoehrmann
Francis Larkin
Frank.Wagner@telekom.de
Hodges, Jeff
Jonathan Mayer
Karl Dubost
- Deliverables to be edited Re: Agenda for 2011-09-28 TPWG call (Thursday, 29 September)
- Facebook tracking (Sunday, 25 September)
- URL Filter List file format (Tuesday, 20 September)
- Opera URL Filter API (Tuesday, 20 September)
- Re: Comments on Web Tracking Protection W3C Member Submission 24 February 2011 (Tuesday, 20 September)
- Comments on Web Tracking Protection W3C Member Submission 24 February 2011 (Monday, 19 September)
- [Minutes] Tracking Protection WG Teleconference 14 & 16 September 2011 (Monday, 19 September)
- [proposal] Template for communicating our issues (Saturday, 17 September)
- Re: 1st Tracking Protection WG F2F - Cambridge, USA - 21-22 September 2011 (Friday, 16 September)
- 1st Tracking Protection WG F2F - Cambridge, USA - 21-22 September 2011 (Thursday, 15 September)
Matthias Schunter
Nicholas Doty
Ninja Marnau
Peter Eckersley
Shane Wiley
Thomas Roessler
Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
- tracking-ISSUE-88: different rules for impression of and interaction with 3rd-party ads/content [Tracking Preference Expression Definitions and Compliance] (Friday, 23 September)
- ISSUE-87: Should there be an option for the server to respond with "I don't know what my policy is" (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-86: Do we have general extensibility capability for header response? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-85: DOM property and its access generally and specifically to web apps (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-84: Do we need a JavaScript API / DOM property for client-side js access to Do Not Track status? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-83: How do you opt out if already opted in? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-82: Should the DNT header be extensible with additional parameters? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-80: Instead of responding with a Link: header URI, does it make sense to use a well-known location for this policy? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-79: Should a server respond if a user sent DNT:0? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-78: What is the difference between absence of DNT header and DNT = 0? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-77: How does a website determine if a first or third party and should this be included in the protocol? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-76: Should a server echo the DNT header to confirm receipt? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-75: How co companies claim exemptions and is that technical or not? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-74: Are surveys out of scope? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-73: In order for analytics or other contracting to count as first-party: by contract, by technical silo, both silo and contract (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-72: Basic principle: independent use as an agent of a first party (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-71: Does DNT also affect past collection or use of past collection of info? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-70: Does a past HTTP request with DNT set affect future HTTP requests? (expiration) (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-69: Should the spec say anything about minimal notice? (ie. don't bury in a privacy policy) (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-68: Should there be functionality for syncing preferences about tracking across different browsers? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-67: Should opt-back-in be stored on the client side? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-66: Can user be allowed to consent to both third party and first party to override general DNT? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-65: How does logged in and logged out state work (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-64: How does preference management work with DNT (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-63: Should there be a popup dialog or something like that which should override DNT? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-62: The browser or embedding site could send an architectural signal to an embedded iframe so it knows it's in a 3rd-party context (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-61: A site could publish a list of the other domains that are associated with them (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-60: Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about whether the user has sent a DNT header to third parties on their site? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-58: What if DNT is explicitly set to 0 and an opt-out cookie is present? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-57: What if an opt-out cookie exists but an "opt back in" out-of-band is present? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-56: What if DNT is unspecified and an opt-out cookie is present? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-55: What is relationship between behavioral advertising and tracking, subset, different items? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-54: Can first party provide targeting based on registration information even while sending DNT (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-53: How should opt-out cookie and DNT signal interact? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-52: What if conflict between opt-out cookie and DNT? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-51: Should 1st party have any response to DNT signal (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-50: Are DNT headers sent to first parties? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-49: Third party as first party - is a third party that collects data on behalf of the first party treated the same way as the first party? (Thursday, 22 September)
- ISSUE-48: Response from the server could both acknowledge receipt of a value and (separately) whether the server will honor it (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-47: Should the response from the server point to a URI of a policy (or an existing protocol) rather than a single bit in the protocol? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-46: Enable users to do more granular blocking based on whether the site responds honoring Do Not Track (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-45: Companies making public commitments with a "regulatory hook" for US legal purposes (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-44: Ability to measure/detect who is honoring Do Not Track at a technical level (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-43: Sites should be able to let the user know their options when they arrive with Do Not Track (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-42: Feedback to the user from the browser when Do Not Track is turned on (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-41: Consistent way to discuss tracking with users (terminology matters!) (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-40: Enable Do Not Track just for a session, rather than being stored (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-39: Tracking of geographic data (however it's determined, or used) (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-38: Granularity for different people who share a device or browser (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-37: Granularity could be as complex as something P3P-style, based on business types and uses (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-36: Should DNT opt-outs distinguish between behavioral targeting and other personalization? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-35: How will DNT interact with existing opt-out programs (industry self-reg, other)? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-34: Possible exemption for aggregate analytics (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-33: Complexity of user choice (are exemptions exposed to users?) (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-32: Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-31: Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption? (conditional exemptions) (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-30: Will Do Not Track apply to offline aggregating or selling of data? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-29: Tracking that may be required by law enforcement (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-28: Exception for mandatory legal process (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-27: Mechanism to revoke Do Not Track for specific entities (maybe I really like Google), "opt back in" (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-26: Providing data to 3rd-party widgets -- does that imply consent? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-25: Possible exemption for research purposes (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-24: Possible exemption for fraud detection and defense (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-23: Possible exemption for analytics (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-22: Still have "operational use" of data (auditing of where ads are shown, impression tracking, etc.) (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-21: Enable external audit of DNT compliance (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-20: Different types of data, what counts as PII, and what definition of PII (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-19: Data collection / Data use (3rd party) (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-18: Collection definition (not sure I said the prefix before?) (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-17: Data use by 1st Party (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-16: What does it mean to collect data? (caching, logging, storage, retention, accumulation, profile etc.) (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-15: What special treatment should there be for children's data? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-14: How does what we talk about with 1st/3rd party relate to European law about data collector vs data processor? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-13: What are the requirements for DNT on apps/native software in addition to browsers? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-12: How does tracking require relation to unique identities, pseudonyms, etc.? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-11: Document a longer list of use cases -- what's going on today (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-10: What is a first party? As an example, CBS and C|Net are the same company but visually distinct websites/brand, is this a first party relationship? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-9: Understand all the different first- and third-party cases. (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-8: How do we enhance transparency and consumer awareness? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-7: What types of tracking exists, and what are the use cases for these types of tracking? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-6: What are the underlying concerns? Why are we doing this / what are people afraid of? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-4: What is the default? Is this an opt-in or an opt-out? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-3: What is the granularity of the choice we expect users to make? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-2: What is the meaning of DNT (Do Not Track) header? (Wednesday, 21 September)
- ISSUE-1: Example issue to be closed, so people can see what an issue looks like. (Wednesday, 21 September)
Last message date: Friday, 30 September 2011 01:48:02 UTC
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo
| Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3