Thanks for all the comments. I push a commit removing the pass: e77624a . It is easy enough to bring it back if we discover some crucial use cases for it. Cheers, Florian > On Jul 28, 2020, at 16:15, Florian Hahn via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > >> On Jul 28, 2020, at 02:11, Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks at google.com> wrote: >> >> Should ConstantProp.cpp also be removed? It doesn't look like it's been worked on in over 10 years, and aside from check-llvm lit tests, the only use is in llvm/unittests/ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/MCJITAPITest.cpp via LLVMAddConstantPropagationPass. >> (it hasn't been ported to the new pass manager which is why I'm asking) > > > If itâs unused/not maintained I think we should also remove it or move it to the examples directory with some additional material, if it is intended to illustrate a simple pass. > > Cheers, > Florian > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200730/13387c7c/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4