I've made the change https://reviews.llvm.org/harbormaster/plan/5/ MyDeveloperDay <https://reviews.llvm.org/p/MyDeveloperDay/> changed the Hold Drafts behavior for this plan from Always to Never. I apologize in advance if that was the wrong thing to do. MyDeveloperDay. On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 1:44 PM MyDeveloper Day <mydeveloperday at gmail.com> wrote: > This is configured in the "pre-merge checks" build plan, the "Hold Drafts" > needs to be set to "Never" > > I should be able to change this in the build plan if you want but I don't > want to step on anyone's toes > > MyDeveloperDay > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 1:35 PM MyDeveloper Day <mydeveloperday at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> See the "Draft Mode" changes, might be related >> https://secure.phabricator.com/w/changelog/2020.16/ >> >> MyDeveloperDay >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 1:32 PM Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 3:29 PM James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Please assume good faith -- I'm pretty sure this is simply a >>> configuration mistake, since Mehdi just upgraded Phabricator to a new >>> upstream revision last night. >>> > Probably the default behavior changed in the new upstream version, and >>> it just needs to be turned off. >>> Yep, that's why i'm asking for the right configuration to be put in >>> place :) >>> >>> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:09 AM Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev < >>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Since the update, new revisions aren't posted immediately, >>> >> but first appear as drafts. There's also this message: >>> >> "This draft revision will be sent for review once this build passes: >>> >> Build 82647: pre-merge checks." (https://reviews.llvm.org/D84742) >>> >> >>> >> As many have seen, pre-merge checks are flaky and just generally >>> unusable, >>> >> and this case was no exception, the build failed and the phabricator >>> >> hsa rejected the revision: "Harbormaster returned this revision to >>> the author >>> >> for changes because remote builds failed." >>> >> There is still no mention of that review in llvm-commits. >>> >> >>> >> Please unbreak phabricator at once :) >>> >> I don't recall seeing any discussion/proposal for any such behaviour. >>> >> >>> >> Roman >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> LLVM Developers mailing list >>> >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >>> >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200728/096c87e2/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4