On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 7:21 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 7/6/20 8:40 PM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:29 PM Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Yep. That thread. It got there eventually around this branch as well. It's a... long thread at this point. > > > > *nod* I think I've read it all - and don't see mention of this > > subproject/fork/thingy. (& that entire thread occurred after (June > > 29th) this email from Roman (June 21st) - and was seeking permission, > > not asking about a pre-existing fork)). Chris proposed a possible fork > > name ("I donât have a opinion on this either way, but can git/GitHub > > maintain forks within the same organization? You could have > > llvm/llvm-project and llvm/llvm-project-apple-staging or something > > like that?") but it's not the one that's already there/Roman's asking > > about (almost the same, though): apple-llvm-project-staging. > > > > So I'm still confused, at least. > > > > Perhaps someone accidentally pushed this branch while trying to > > prototype ideas before sending the proposal? > > > > This was a repo I created as a landing spot for the Apple patches > that were discussed in the recent mailing list thread. We eventually > decided this was the wrong approach and that the issue should be brought > before the community for discussion. The repo is gone now, sorry for > the confusion. Cool, no worries - thanks for the context & cleanup! > > - Tom > > > > - Dave > > > >> > >> -eric > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:27 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:21 PM Eric Christopher via llvm-dev > >>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> There's an email thread at this point :) > >>> > >>> You mean http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/142951.html > >>> ? I wasn't sure that was directly related - since that thread seems to > >>> be asking for permission/buy-in to /add/ a branch, it doesn't (based > >>> on my reading at least) talk about any pre-existing branch, which is > >>> what Roman seems to be asking about? > >>> > >>> So I'm not sure if they're related or not. > >>> > >>> - Dave > >>> > >>>> > >>>> -eric > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 4:01 AM Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hello. > >>>>> > >>>>> Some time ago, https://github.com/llvm/apple-llvm-project-staging appeared. > >>>>> I do not recall seeing any discussions about it (especially before the > >>>>> fact) here. > >>>>> > >>>>> It is a standalone repository, not a fork, therefore github wrongfully counts > >>>>> everyones commits twice - once in the proper repo, and once in there. > >>>>> That can not be worked around, as far as i understand. > >>>>> > >>>>> So, why is it there in the first place? > >>>>> Why was there no discussion about it? > >>>>> Why is it not in https://github.com/apple ? > >>>>> Can it be moved in the right place? > >>>>> > >>>>> Roman. > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list > >>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > >>>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> LLVM Developers mailing list > >>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > >>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4