Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes: > Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar@thaodan.de> writes: > >> I also was under the impression that fondering is better using PGTK when >> using a high dpi screen, even under X11. Was that wrong? > > If by "fondering" you mean font display, then yes, that was wrong: the > same Cairo font backend as the default X11 build is also used by the > PGTK build. Hm something must be wrong then if it didn't scale properly outside of the X11 build. >> Now there's this big warning block wich appears when you use PGTK under >> X11. > >> - Will it break emacs --daemon? The frame is spawned right when the X11 >> display connection is initiated. > > Yes, it will crash regardless. It didn't crash before.. >> - I think it kinda rude to right out spawn a big window on every start, >> it doesn't fit into how emacs usually acts. What I'm trying to say is >> I think it is ok so show a warning every time server starts but adding >> this big blob of text that spawns 2/10 of the screen when Emacs is in >> fullscreen is a little much. > > The other alternative we considered was to prevent Emacs from starting > under X11 when compiled with PGTK. Or make it run as good as it can under X11 and leave the rest of the remaining issues as work as intended until a fix is found >> I wonder how viable this strategy if Emacs has to be compiled twice for >> Wayland support. > > The alternative is to have an Emacs that crashes under X11 in various > common situations. Please read the message in the dialog box. Emacs might to something strange with GTK then, it is the only program having these issues. So far I didn't experience such issues. Br, Björn
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4