A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2022-11/msg01554.html below:

Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] From: Ihor Radchenko Subject: Re: Delegating user-reserved key binding space definition to users Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 03:31:17 +0000 
Psionic K <psionik@positron.solutions> writes:

> Abstract commands are just command remap targets in the global map.  The
> concrete global commands would directly command remap in the global map.
> Abstract command bindings would be consumed when modes generate keymaps for
> major & minor modes.  A Corfu map generator would for example see an
> abstract command like "user-next" bound with the C-n sequence and choose to
> shadow C-n in its map.  If the user rebinds the global abstract command,
> the other modes could easily follow this change, perhaps even though a hook
> to immediately propagate the change.

+1

Anyone who tried to re-bind default bindings for, say, C-n/C-p/n/p might
be familiar what the problem with current Emacs approach is. It is very
annoying to keep tweaking every single package bindings out there and
also deal with cascading key collisions.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4