Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net> writes: > I agree that each should be debated on its own merits. But has the > burden been reversed? Could we argue why they should be removed rather > than why they should be kept? Lars did make the argument at the time that they had surprising and hard-to-understand semantics. So I think that general principle is one that we already try to follow. > And I don't know who has the time to research and argue to undo 38 > individual things that I wish hadn't been done all-at-once in the first > place. :) I'd suggest reporting bugs to unobsolete only the ones you care about. The ones you don't care about are probably okay to obsolete, right? And if they are not, others will report bugs.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4