A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2022-11/msg01289.html below:

Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Tree-sitter and major mode inheritance Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:52:49 +0200 
> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 09:17:11 -0800
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
>  emacs-devel@gnu.org,
>  theo@thornhill.no
> 
> If we are already renaming existing modes (cc-<foo>-mode), why don’t we use 
> the generic name <foo>-mode for the virtual parent mode? It would be nicer if 
> the generic mode (<foo>-mode) is an actual mode, with mode hooks, keycaps, 
> etc, rather than simply a dispatch function.

I already said that I prefer not to rename existing modes.  Such
renaming will break too many init files and other Lisp programs.

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4