A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2022-11/msg01203.html below:

Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] From: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 09:53:37 -0500 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) 
> Why do you not consider __attribute__((always_inline)) an improvement
> over macros where applicable?

Can we drop this discussion.  AFAIK all those who matter already
explained clearly that we generally agree it's an improvement, but that
it's not enough of an improvement to justify making the change just for
the sake of it.

IOW we all agree on the general idea, we just disagree on the degrees
and I see no way we'll convince each other to agree on what degree
is right.  So we just have to tolerate other people's preferences, with
the understanding that none of us is *right*.


        Stefan

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4