On 14 November 2022 02:16:13 CET, Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> wrote: >Thanks to Theoâs great work, we now have tree-sitter powered major modes for >C, C++, Java, JSON, CSS. Right now they are named c-ts-mode, c++-ts-mode, >java-ts-mode, etc. And c-ts-mode and c++-ts-mode inherits from a dummy mode >c-ts-mode--base-mode. > >I think itâs fair to make C, C++ and Java modes independent, since all the >cc-mode options are invalidated when we use tree-sitter. However, their name >could be improved, IMO. But I canât think of anything better than c-ts-mode :-) > >(neo-c-mode⦠just saying) > I agree and can't think of a better name either... >c-ts-mode--base-mode should probably be a public mode, since the intention >(IIUC) is enable users to configure C and C++ together, by adding hooks to >this base-mode. So something like c-base-mode or c-ts-base-mode? > Sure! >CSS and JSON could be merged with current modes, I think. Css-ts-mode could >merge with css-mode, and json-ts-mode could be merged with js-json-mode. Or we >can just have a dedicated json-mode. > >Theo, WDYT? > That's fine with me. In any case I think we should remove tree-sitter support from js-json-mode (or merge them). I think there exist a json-mode in both elpa and melpa, adding another isn't the best idea I think. Not sure what is best, really. My vote goes to merging css and keeping others separate, but I don't have the strongest opinion there. I can prepare such a patch after we decide on something. Theo
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4