Nov 14, 2022, 13:54 by eliz@gnu.org: >> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:52:50 +0100 (CET) >> From: xenodasein@tutanota.de >> Cc: "xenodasein--- viaEmacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>, >> eliz@gnu.org >> >> My whole complaint is that this is not happening, so the trend here >> should be reducing lines of code, but opposite is happening. This >> not a good direction. >> > > You are entitled to your opinions, but we disagree, and we have many > years of experience to present as evidence. > > Given such stark differences of assumptions, opinions, and experience > in Emacs development, I see no reason to keep arguing about this. > Experience in accomplishing what exactly? How can I examine this evidence? I don't know what are your goals, is going down from 5% percent to 4% on StackOverflow's survey this year is one of them? I really want to see this story of success, but wherever I look that has numbers tells that you can't compare numbers even with Notepad++. Perhaps you can point out what kind of thing can change your decisions on things like this, but I find it hard to understand how leaving whoever comes after you an even bigger Emacs despite having said currently no one understands all parts of it.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4