A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2022-11/msg00862.html below:

Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages

Otherwise, we've just acquired some extra complexity in the reader,
xref and elisp completion code, while the anticipated benefits are
very slow to materialize.
I'm not sure the complexity is that much (it was a long time ago, but I
believe it was reasonably low).  But you're right, the benefits of
shorthands so far are just programmer convenience for libraries outside
of Emacs.  I've enjoyed using them, and I would guess a small number of
programmers are also taking advantage of them them in some side
projects, judging from a quick GitHub code search.
Half a year has passed now since Emacs 28.1's release, and even longer
than that since the "shorthands" have been installed on master, and I
don't see a single mention of them on s.el's issue tracker.

Ditto for dash.el and f.el.
For the record, I think you're completely right.  But hey, this is
Emacs, it moves slowly.  Again, if you understand the plan I put forth
and you think it's viable, then speak up and let's get things moving.

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4