A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2022-11/msg00856.html below:

Re: feature/package-vc has been merged

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] From: Rudolf Adamkovič Subject: Re: feature/package-vc has been merged Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 23:20:02 +0100 
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:

>> And speaking of `-autoremove', should we also add `-vc-autoremove'?
>
> My concern is that it seems easy to accidentally delete some changes
> hidden away in a branch or stash.  Or even on the master/main branch.

Good point!

> Should such a command double check that no local changes exist before
> autoremoving, and ask for an additional confirmation if that is the
> case, perhaps?

That would make it super-duper, but I guess we cannot do that check
easily, can we?  The user can have uncommitted changes but also commits
on various branches, non-versioned patch and scratch files lying around,
and who knows what else.

Rudy
-- 
"Logic is a science of the necessary laws of thought, without which no
employment of the understanding and the reason takes place."
-- Immanuel Kant, 1785

Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis@me.com> [he/him]
Studenohorská 25
84103 Bratislava
Slovakia

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4