> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 20:19:00 +0100 (CET) > From: xenodasein@tutanota.de > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > The packages in lisp/ aren't orphans, just look at the Git logs. (How > > can you seriously consider the Lisp packages in core "frozen" when we > > average 5000 commits a year for the past ten years?? Where do all > > those commits go, in your opinion?) > > > > There seems to be many like allout that don't receive a commit for > decades (apart from a typo fix or two). Which means they are probably not used by many, or don't need any changes. That's natural. > AFAICT most go to new additions. Not true. > Stefan K seems to do a lot of thankless housekeeping in that direction, I guess you only looked at the last year or two. > but more importantly there was the force of nature from Lars before you > ahem frustrated him away, so my criticism mostly applies to from then on; > by all means if we can get Lars back to fixing the million line > interdependent Elisp code, I'll grunt no more. The way I see it options > are immediately to stop anything else and to hold communions and pray to > get him back, or just start downsizing. Once again, I'm talking about the last decade, not the last couple of years. You are missing the big picture. And anyway, I don't see what all this has to do with having a package in core or not.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4