xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org> writes: > I hope you will reconsider this approach of adding everything to core > at some point. Historically, yes, everything was added to core. Not so much in the last decade or so: what I see is that we are gradually working towards reducing our scope, and moving inessential things out (see the lisp/obsolete directory). I think this is a good thing, and we should continue that work. The new things that do get added tend to be key features and libraries where it *really* makes sense to have them in core. We must provide some minimal set of features by default if Emacs is to be useful to anyone, so this is also a good thing. But my argument was not about this. The idea was that keeping use-package external might make it easier for us to leverage the community that already exists around that package (see the 150+ issues in the tracker, open pull requests, etc.). On the other hand, moving it to core might entice parts of that existing community to engage with core development. That would also be a good thing. So, at the end of the day, I'm sure we'll be fine either way.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4