> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 17:11:57 +0100 (CET) > From: xenodasein@tutanota.de > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > From: Eli Zaretskii > Subject: Re: Adding use-package to core > Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 09:31:11 +0200 > > I don't share Stefan's fears. If the only issue with moving > > use-package to core is that someone must step forward to take the > > responsibility for maintaining it, I think we can move it into core > > without fear. I see no reason for making a dedicated maintainer for > > use-package a prerequisite for importing it, given what John says > > about its stability. It's a non-issue. > > Why don't you? This package has been very popular for a long time and > at least I haven't seen anyone complain about it not being in core. > Whatever gets included seem to freeze in time and becomes very hard to > make non-breaking changes, and their writers probably get frustrated > from that more easily and stop developing it. There's ever more lines of > code and more packages, I don't think this direction is sustainable and > I hope you will reconsider this approach of adding everything to core > at some point. If you have read this discussion, you've seen that the package's author thinks it's best to move use-package into core, and describes the package as stable without any need for significant development. So I think your comments are based on some misunderstanding.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4