From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Adding use-package to core Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 09:31:11 +0200 > I don't share Stefan's fears. If the only issue with moving > use-package to core is that someone must step forward to take the > responsibility for maintaining it, I think we can move it into core > without fear. I see no reason for making a dedicated maintainer for > use-package a prerequisite for importing it, given what John says > about its stability. It's a non-issue. Why don't you? This package has been very popular for a long time and at least I haven't seen anyone complain about it not being in core. Whatever gets included seem to freeze in time and becomes very hard to make non-breaking changes, and their writers probably get frustrated from that more easily and stop developing it. There's ever more lines of code and more packages, I don't think this direction is sustainable and I hope you will reconsider this approach of adding everything to core at some point.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4