Payas Relekar <relekarpayas@gmail.com> writes: > Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes: > >>>> 1. Get use-package in ELPA >>>> 2. Complete all documentation >>>> 3. Prepare documentation in texinfo >>>> Will cross that bridge when 2 is done. >> >> While we are at it, is there a rationale for this order? I mean, there >> is no hurry, right? My misunderstanding was that the order was 2 -> 3 -> >> 1. Or are you planning to have use-package ready for Emacs 29? > > If you mean merging use-package into emacs.git, that will definitely not > be happening (at least if I'm the only one working on it). [...] > From my understanding, ELPA has less stringent requirements for > documentation and testing compared to core. Since I cannot commit enough > time to complete all the tasks before expected 29 branch-off, ELPA is a > good compromise IMO. OK, I'll bite. I have time to dedicate to this task; perhaps we can move quickly enough for Emacs 29. Ultimately, the decision will be with the maintainers, but it seems to me that use-package.el itself is in shape for inclusion. Could you write up a summary of what needs doing before we can add use-package to emacs.git? Is it just a matter of writing up some more documentation, or is there more that needs doing? > As for the order rationale, getting use-package to ELPA means less > friction and more users can try it out, more feedback, more eyeballs, > basically. If we get it into core, we can make it into a :core package.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4