> On Nov 10, 2022, at 2:49 PM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote: > >>> I haven't had a chance to try it out, but it looks good to me, tho >>> `beginning-of-defun-raw` doesn't mention anything about its return value >>> in the its docstring, so we may want to tweak that docstring (and >>> review its code to make sure that it indeed returns the value we need >>> in all cases, tho I suspect you've done so already). >> >> (Sorry for the delay) Yes, it returns nil in all cases. Pretty sure thatâs >> the intent from the very beginning (looking at git logs). How about >> this patch? > > LGTM, thank you! I pushed this to feature/tree-sitter. I looked at tests for end-of-defun, the only one I found runs fine. I could add a test for this change but I donât know what weâll test for. > PS: I'm very happy to work with you: I just babble about and you > go and do the grunt work. Half kidding, obviously, but really, > I appreciate it, thank you. > Oh thank you! That made my day :-) Yuan
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4