> On Oct 27, 2022, at 8:25 AM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote: > >>> No, you're quite right. We should double check that >>> `beginning-of-defun-raw` was successful (and do something else if not). >> How about: > > I haven't had a chance to try it out, but it looks good to me, tho > `beginning-of-defun-raw` doesn't mention anything about its return value > in the its docstring, so we may want to tweak that docstring (and > review its code to make sure that it indeed returns the value we need > in all cases, tho I suspect you've done so already). (Sorry for the delay) Yes, it returns nil in all cases. Pretty sure thatâs the intent from the very beginning (looking at git logs). How about this patch? Yuan
end-of-defun.diff
Description: Binary data
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4