> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 20:22:00 +0200 > Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, arash@gnu.org, theophilusx@gmail.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> > > On 10.11.2022 18:50, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 17:35:55 +0200 > >> Cc:arash@gnu.org,theophilusx@gmail.com,emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> From: Dmitry Gutov<dgutov@yandex.ru> > >> > >> If you just have a command (to be used interactively, right?), it will > >> only affect the value in the current session. > > The command could do whatever we want it to do, including writing to > > the user's init file, if the user wants that. And if the command is > > invoked from the init file, it will affect the current session, in > > every session. > > The user can normally choose where the customizations are stored (inside > the init file, or in some file alongside it). When they use defcustoms? only globally, for all the defcustoms, not individually for each defcustom. > If you're suggesting the proposed command reimplements that logic (and > honors the value of custom-file? ignores it?), that seems like a poor > choice in my POV. There's no need to reimplement anything, because we can use the same APIs that Custom uses. For example Options->Save options from the menu bar already does that.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4